Our Products Our Values Our Company
Home > Our Blog

HQ Sustainable Blog
Herbivore Seafood: A “Green” Choice for the Pescatarians and Meat-eaters Among Us
March 9, 2010
By  Norbert Sporns

Most of us enjoy farmed, quality protein from a variety of animals.  In fact, the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) reported, the average American consumed 200 pounds of chicken, pork and beef and another 13 pounds of shrimp, tuna, salmon, tilapia, pollock and catfish (known in the industry as “top 6 seafood”). While all of the land-dwelling animals on our most frequently consumed proteins list are herbivores, many of the seafood proteins are not. 

In an effort to make our global food chain more sustainable, the aquaculture industry began by farming carnivorous proteins—initially salmon, trout and shrimp—in ocean cages. This means that early fish farmers could breed carnivorous seafood, but that they had to harvest other animals from the sea in order to sustain their stock.

Two herbivores, or natural omnivores that do well as herbivores, are tilapia and catfish.  To farm these herbivorous proteins, there is no need to catch other fish for food. Furthermore, tilapia and catfish are not farmed in Ocean cages, but in fresh or brackish inland ponds that result in considerably less pollution and with the obvious good sense of reducing pressures on our oceans.

Food for thought.

Tilapia as Cost-Effective Seafood
February 23, 2010
By  Norbert Sporns

Steve Hedlund’s recent article, “What’s Holding Back U.S. Seafood Consumption?” on SeafoodSource.com, addresses the hurdles that the U.S. seafood industry must clear to increase seafood consumption by the year 2020.  He focuses on five major impediments;

  • increased consumption:
  • the economy;
  • food safety regulations;
  • trade barriers;
  • the lack of supply; and,
  • the lack of consumer education.   

I believe that the first hurdle consumers must pass is cost.  Fish is a more expensive protein than dinnertime staples like chicken, beef and pork.  Consumers are starting to learn that investments in their diets will offer a return on investment in their health.  But, not everyone is ready to put their money where their mouths are—literally.

To those not quite ready to make a major investment, I’d encourage a foray into tilapia.  It is the lowest cost alternative to other fish and seafood.

For daily recipes to help you try Tilapia in your home, follow us on Twitter at HQSustainable.

Food for thought.

Aquaculture’s Impact in Developing Countries
February 9, 2010
By  Norbert Sporns

Aquaculture’s Impact in Developing Countries

How does inland freshwater-farmed fish impact the lives of the people working on these farms in developing countries? 

Much relies on the methods used.  But, my experience with HQ Sustainable has shown the impact to be very positive in Hainan, China, where we farm tilapia in 1,000 co-op ponds. 

Suitable methods of farming must take into consideration the availability of water resources and the use of waste water from the farms. The use made of the land must be the highest and best farm use, cannot include removal of another valuable farming resource. As with most businesses, location is key.

China encourages aquaculture investment in rural areas, in part, to help maintain rural communities and reduce migration and unmanageable cost pressures on big cities.  The investment made in construction of ponds and aqueducts is a valuable infrastructure. The revenues flowing from aquaculture are much higher per acre than other farmed crops.

In our cooperative of Chinese tilapia farmers, a pond is typically 2.5 acres in area with a depth of over 6.5 feet. Such a pond can produce 2 harvests of about 15 metric tons per harvest, or a total of 30 tons. Live fish prices are roughly $1 per pound in the U.S., this means an annual revenue per pond of about $66,000 or a $12,000 to $15,000 operating profit per pond, per year. The average income of China in 2006 was $2,025 per person. One pond can account for gainful employment for as many as 7 people at these values.

How is Farming Sustainable Tilapia “All Natural?”
January 26, 2010
By  Norbert Sporns

We’re all bombarded with food packaging or menu items that suggest what we’re eating is “all natural,” but what does it mean?  In the farming process, the feed used and environment provided to raise an “all natural” food product are key. 

Fish eat what is available in their environments according to their innate appetites. Tilapia are omnivores and eat water based plants and organisms that include algae, duck weed and tadpoles. In a farming environment, feed is chosen to optimize growth while reducing costs, without compromising the quality of the fish protein consumed or harming the environment. 

Feed chosen is all-important since we are what we eat. Quality feed ingredients like corn and soya that don’t include animal by-products, makes for a more natural product to some.  If nothing else it is more sustainable. Sustainability is a key component of “all natural.”  

The farming steps needed to ensure that tilapia is “all natural,” include:

  • Avoiding the use of antibiotics and hormones;
  • Managing pond waste through the introduction of bottom-feeding fish;
  • Introducing predator fish that feed on unhealthy fish to manage variations in health amongst the tilapia;
  • Stocking fish in the pond at levels that eliminate the need for artificial pond aeration, or the addition of chemicals;
  • Refusing to use preservatives such as TPP (tripolyphosphate) at the processing plant; and,
  • Labeling products for public consumption reflecting the actual weight of the meat, not the weight of ice frozen to the fish (glaze).

Food for thought.

Sustainability Defined: Ocean-Caught vs Farmed Fish
January 12, 2010
By  Norbert Sporns

The word sustainable is used frequently without much reflection on its different meanings. We all agree that abuse of our environment is not sustainable. But, when you’re buying food—namely seafood–what qualifies as sustainable?

 Contrast the use of the word sustainable in its very different applications to ocean-caught fish (literally fish caught by boats of fishermen on our seas) and aquaculture (fish grown in land or sea-based aquatic farms).  The meaning of sustainable in relation to the ocean harvest is obvious–if you pull too many fish out of the ocean, species may become extinct and global food supply may be depleted. The meaning of sustainable in relation to aquaculture is very different. 

With aquaculture, you can always harvest 100% of what you have seeded and grown (except for brooding stock). Harvesting levels are not what is scrutinized by regulatory bodies. Instead, the impact of farming on the surrounding environment (pollution, escapes of non-native fish, use of chemicals) and the use of animal byproducts in the feed are the most important to evaluating the sustainability of aquaculture.

 The audit of these two applications of seafood sustainability has become big business. In the case of ocean-caught fish, we have limited data and guess what is sustainable. In fish farming, we have unlimited data and know what is sustainable.

North Atlantic cod was pulled out of the ocean and labeled “sustainable” until it disappeared from the seas and appeared on the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources’ Red List. Someone guessed wrong.

Food for thought.

  Our Products
 


To bring quality to every aspect of HQ's vertically integrated aquatic products business.

Increase profitability through the introduction of all-natural products while respecting the environment and communities in which it works

 
  Our Values
 
("HQ") is an integrated aquaculture and aquatic product processing company, with operations based in the environmentally pristine island province of Hainan, in China's South Sea.
Tag List
Archives